When we refer to a “direct relationship” or similar terms we are describing our preferred way of working with employees. We are not implying that this relationship would cease to exist if employees chose to be represented by a labor union. However, it is important to acknowledge that the nature of the relationship would change.
Usually, when employees are represented by a union, there’s a contract that spells out things like pay, benefits, and other job details. Everyone — including management, employees, and the union — has to stick to what’s in that contract, even if some parts aren’t ideal on a personal, individual level. This makes it harder for us to work together and adjust quickly when things change at work. Even if the contract doesn’t directly get in the way, having a union means there’s another layer added to how we interact and solve problems together.
Under the National Labor Relations Act, while employees would still have the right to meet with their supervisor or manager to address workplace issues if a union were present the union would need to be informed in advance and afforded the opportunity to participate in these discussions. This added procedural step introduces a different dynamic to these interactions. We believe that a direct, private relationship fosters a more open and efficient dialogue, with greater flexibility and speed to solve workplace issues, which is why it remains our preferred approach.